Clark v. Safety-Kleen Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \ Rubanick changed the focus of the inquiry from the scientific community's acceptance of the substance of the opinion to its acceptance of the methodology and reasoning underlying it.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hisenaj v. Kuehner
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-03-06· cited 251×
• In re Accutane Litig.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2018-08-01· cited 84×
• Mendez v. Shah
  D. New Jersey· 2014-06-27· cited 42×
• IN RE: ACCUTANE LITIGATION (MCL NO. 271, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-07-28· cited 4×
• Arthur G. Whelan v. Armstrong International,Inc.(081810) (Middlesex County & Statewide)
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2020-06-03

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Landrigan v. Celotex Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-05-06· cited 192×
• Coffman v. Keene Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-26· cited 120×
• Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-30· cited 120×
• Rubanick v. Witco Chemical Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-08-01· cited 118×
• Hake v. Manchester Township
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-01-22· cited 67×
• Vuocolo v. Diamond Shamrock Chem.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-04-20· cited 62×
• Vallillo v. Muskin Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-07-16· cited 29×