Skip to main content
· 8/18/2008

Clark v. Medtronic, Inc.

Citations

  • 572 F. Supp. 2d 1090
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63000
  • 2008 WL 3851538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting reliance on “res ipsa loquitur for the proposition that full compliance 10 WEBER V. ALLERGAN would have resulted in a problem-free device”
  • “As the Supreme Court aptly recognized [in Riegel], the premarket approval process is ultimately a cost- benefit analysis in which the potential health benefits are weighed against the potential risks.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James M. Rosenbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.