Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 5/3/2016

Clark Baker v. Jeffrey Deshong

Citations

  • 821 F.3d 620
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8014
  • 2016 WL 2342963

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the Octane Fitness standard to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), the Lanham Act’s fee-shifting provision
  • borrowing attorneys’ fees jurisprudence under the Patent Act to interpret the fee-shift- ing provision in the Lanham Act
  • characterizing the fee-shifting provisions in the Lanham Act and Pa- tent Act as “statutory equivalents” and determining that “Congress in- tended” the provisions “to have the same meaning” given their “parallel purpose, structure, and language”
  • “While Octane Fitness directly concerns the scope of a district court’s discretion to award fees for an ‘exceptional’ case under § 285 of the Patent Act, the case guides our interpretation of § 1117(a) of the Lanham Act and is instructive here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carl, Stewart, Jones, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.