Fifth Circuit· 5/3/2016
Clark Baker v. Jeffrey Deshong
Citations
- 821 F.3d 620
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8014
- 2016 WL 2342963
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the Octane Fitness standard to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), the Lanham Act’s fee-shifting provision
- borrowing attorneys’ fees jurisprudence under the Patent Act to interpret the fee-shift- ing provision in the Lanham Act
- characterizing the fee-shifting provisions in the Lanham Act and Pa- tent Act as “statutory equivalents” and determining that “Congress in- tended” the provisions “to have the same meaning” given their “parallel purpose, structure, and language”
- “While Octane Fitness directly concerns the scope of a district court’s discretion to award fees for an ‘exceptional’ case under § 285 of the Patent Act, the case guides our interpretation of § 1117(a) of the Lanham Act and is instructive here.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carl, Stewart, Jones, Dennis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sunearth, Inc. v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co.Ninth Circuit· 2016-10-24· cited 164×
- Sleepy's LLC v. Select Comfort Wholesale Corp.Second Circuit· 2018-11-27· cited 80×
- Edward Lewis Tobinick, MD v. M.D. Steven NOvellaEleventh Circuit· 2018-03-08· cited 63×
- Scholz v. GoudreauFirst Circuit· 2018-08-21· cited 34×
- Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2017-08-09· cited 26×
- Alliance for Good Government v. Coalition for BettFifth Circuit· 2019-03-21· cited 23×
- LHO Chicago River, L.L.C. v. Joseph PerilloSeventh Circuit· 2019-11-08· cited 22×
- Yah Kai World Wide Enters., Inc. v. NapperD.C. Circuit· 2018-02-21· cited 13×
- Stacey Vetter v. Christine McAteeFifth Circuit· 2017-03-01· cited 8×
- Alli Good Govt v. Coaltn Better GovtFifth Circuit· 2021-05-19· cited 7×
- Appliance v. Axis SupplyFifth Circuit· 2024-06-21· cited 6×
- Express Homebuyers USA, LLC v. WBH Mktg., Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2018-10-25· cited 2×
- Yah Kai World Wide Enterprises, Inc. v. NapperDistrict of Columbia· 2018-02-21
- Sleepy's LLC v. Select ComfortSecond Circuit· 2018-11-27
- Hutchinson Industries, Inc. v. DBL Designs, LLCTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2022-09-29
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 4,586×
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1978-01-23· cited 3,039×
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-03-01· cited 1,767×
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 772×
- Fair Wind Sailing Inc v. H. DempsterThird Circuit· 2014-09-04· cited 457×
- Communications Workers of America v. BeckSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 361×
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court· 2014-04-29· cited 293×
- B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.Supreme Court· 2015-03-24· cited 222×
- Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.Ninth Circuit· 2002-06-19· cited 167×
- Levin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-03-04· cited 160×
- Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-01-04· cited 140×
- Cjc Holdings, Inc., D/B/A Artcarved v. Wright & Lato, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1992-12-15· cited 132×
- Scott Fetzer Co. v. House of Vacuums Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2004-08-12· cited 123×
- Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products v. Von Drehle CorporationFourth Circuit· 2015-03-30· cited 67×
- Noxell Corp. v. Firehouse No. 1 Bar-B-Que RestaurantD.C. Circuit· 1985-08-23· cited 55×
- Ting Ji v. Bose Corp.First Circuit· 2010-11-23· cited 36×
- B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2013-05-01· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.