· 4/29/2014
Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 1749
- 188 L. Ed. 2d 816
- 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3107
- 110 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1337
- 82 U.S.L.W. 4330
- 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 726
- 2014 WL 1672251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the fee-shifting provision of the Lanham Act was “identical” to the fee-shifting provision of the Patent Act
- noting that fees do not constitute “a penalty for failure to win a patent infringement suit,” and are appropriate only in “extraordinary circumstances.”
- noting that the fee-shifting provision of the Lanham Act was “identical” to the fee-shifting provision of the Patent Act
- noting that the fee-shifting provision of the Lanham Act was “identical” to the fee-shifting provision of the Patent Act
- noting that the Lanham Act's fee-shifting provision is \identical\ to that of the Patent Act
- finding that bad faith is unnecessary for an award of attorney’s fees under the analogous fee-shifting provision of the Patent Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.