Cjc Holdings, Inc., D/B/A Artcarved v. Wright & Lato, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a focus on neglect or culpable conduct is more consistent with Rule 60(b) than a focus on willfulness
• stating that lack of damages is an important consideration in determining whether a ease is exceptional
• noting that an unpatented and uncopyrighted product can normally be copied
• noting that such “preying” conduct would support a determination of exceptionality
• noting that an unpatented and uncopyrighted product can normally be copied
• inferring from parallel language in the fee provisions of the Patent Act and Lanham Act that Congress meant for similar standards to apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).