CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Stanley
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4229
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling Appellants' Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from a foreclosure judgment. Appellants did not demonstrate that they failed to answer or otherwise respond to Appellee's complaint as a result of excusable neglect, nor did they allege operative facts warranting a hearing on the motion. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., concurring.)
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 2,230×
- Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court· 1987-11-10· cited 822×
- Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-31· cited 507×
- Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Professionals Guild of OhioOhio Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 143×
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Roznowski (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-05-15· cited 129×
- National City Commercial Capital Corp. v. AAAA At Your Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-07-05· cited 60×
- Fifth Third Bank v. Dayton Lodge Ltd. Liab. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-27· cited 11×
- Dibert v. CarpenterOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-24· cited 8×
Other cases named CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Stanley
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.