Nationstar Mortgage, L.L.C. v. Abston
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3003
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from a default judgment of foreclosure. The trial court reasonably concluded that appellant failed to show merit in his defense that he was not in default of the note and in his claim of promissory estoppel. The trial court also reasonably concluded that appellant failed to show that his failure to respond to appellee's motion for default judgment constituted excusable neglect or that appellee had committed fraud. Lastly, the trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion for relief from judgment without a hearing, because appellant failed to allege operative facts of a meritorious claim or defense. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that casinos, bowling alleys, restaurants, and other “similar secular entities” were limited to 50 percent of fire-code capacity but houses of worship were limited to 50 people, regardless of fire-code capacity, and applying strict scrutiny
- applying strict scrutiny to First Amendment claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.