Cigainero v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that claims of juror misconduct could be raised for the first time in a Rule 37 proceeding
• rejecting argument that claims of juror misconduct could be raised for the first time in a Rule 37 proceeding
• juror misconduct claim could not be raised in postconviction proceeding but must be raised in a motion for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Howard v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-06-29· cited 177×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-10-01· cited 15×
• Beulah v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-04-03· cited 12×
• Karl D. Roberts v. State of Arkansas
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2020-01-30· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pineview Farms, Inc. v. A.O. Smith Harvestore, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-02-27· cited 32×
• Cigainero v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-10-05· cited 15×
• Bailey v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-02-22· cited 12×
• Chisum v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1981-11-30· cited 12×
• Cotton v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-10-19· cited 6×