Supreme Court of Arkansas· 11/30/1981
Chisum v. State
Citations
- 625 S.W.2d 448
- 274 Ark. 332
- 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1479
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Rule 36.22 fixes “the time for filing a motion for a new trial as that allowed for the filing of a notice of appeal (ordinarily 30 days)”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George Rose Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-01-13· cited 52×
- Dumond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-01-25· cited 37×
- Lewellen v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-06-12· cited 22×
- McDaniel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-04-02· cited 17×
- Cigainero v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-10-05· cited 15×
- Cigainero v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-09-18· cited 8×
- Perry v. NorrisE.D. Arkansas· 1995-03-03· cited 7×
- Walker v. LockhartE.D. Arkansas· 1984-12-06· cited 3×
- Banning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1993-09-15· cited 3×
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-02-09· cited 3×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.