Beulah v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent of the parties and that the proper administration of the law cannot be left to the stipulation of the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bullock v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-06-12· cited 25×
• Green v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-06-02· cited 21×
• Burks v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2009-12-03· cited 13×
• City of Clinton v. Southern Paramedic Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2012-03-01· cited 12×
• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2016-04-07· cited 6×
• State v. Pratt
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2010-11-18· cited 5×
• Roberts v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-12-01· cited 4×
• William Edward Gray v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-10-27· cited 1×
• Adam S. Childers v. State of Arkansas
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2020-06-11

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nooner v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-11-18· cited 29×
• Carney v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-05-06· cited 15×
• Burrell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-03-10· cited 12×
• Payne v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-01-13· cited 11×
• State v. J.B.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-03-31· cited 10×
• Cigainero v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-09-18· cited 8×
• Mills v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-09-23· cited 2×