Christopher Scott Hughes v. Eleventh Judicial

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that federal courts consistently abstain from interfering in state criminal prosecutions unless a limited exception applies
• concluding that federal courts consistently abstain from interfering in state criminal prosecutions unless a limited exception applies
• concluding that federal courts consistently abstain from interfering in state criminal prosecutions unless a limited exception applies
• concluding that federal courts consistently abstain from interfering in state criminal prosecutions unless a limited exception applies
• concluding that federal courts consistently abstain from interfering in state criminal prosecutions unless a limited exception applies
• concluding that federal courts consistently abstain from interfering in state criminal prosecutions unless a limited exception applies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).