Supreme Court· 6/9/1975
Kugler v. Helfant
Citations
- 421 U.S. 117
- 95 S. Ct. 1524
- 44 L. Ed. 2d 15
- 1975 U.S. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “ordinarily a pending state prosecution provides the accused a fair and sufficient opportunity for vindication of federal constitutional rights”
- recognizing that “ordinarily a pending state prosecution provides the accused a fair and sufficient opportunity for vindication of federal constitutional rights”
- explaining that a bad faith prosecution “generally means that a prosecution has been brought without a reasonable expectation of obtaining a valid conviction”
- recognizing that the extraordinary circum- stances exception “is a nebulous one”
- noting that an “extraordinary” exception for bad faith would require a prosecution brought “without a reasonable expectation of obtaining a valid conviction”
- noting that “ordinarily a pending state prosecution provides the accused a fair and sufficient opportunity for vindication of federal constitutional rights”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Burger, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Douglas, Brennan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.