Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/9/1975

Kugler v. Helfant

Citations

  • 421 U.S. 117
  • 95 S. Ct. 1524
  • 44 L. Ed. 2d 15
  • 1975 U.S. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “ordinarily a pending state prosecution provides the accused a fair and sufficient opportunity for vindication of federal constitutional rights”
  • recognizing that “ordinarily a pending state prosecution provides the accused a fair and sufficient opportunity for vindication of federal constitutional rights”
  • explaining that a bad faith prosecution “generally means that a prosecution has been brought without a reasonable expectation of obtaining a valid conviction”
  • recognizing that the extraordinary circum- stances exception “is a nebulous one”
  • noting that an “extraordinary” exception for bad faith would require a prosecution brought “without a reasonable expectation of obtaining a valid conviction”
  • noting that “ordinarily a pending state prosecution provides the accused a fair and sufficient opportunity for vindication of federal constitutional rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Burger, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Douglas, Brennan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.