District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/4/2001
Childers v. State
Citations
- 782 So. 2d 946
- 2001 WL 321193
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a “challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence was an issue for direct appeal, and therefore [is] not cognizable” in postconviction proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Corzo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-13· cited 66×
- Dowling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-19· cited 3×
- Bedford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-02· cited 3×
- Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-24· cited 2×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-24· cited 1×
- April Thomason v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-11-20
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-08· cited 331×
- Koon v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-03-25· cited 104×
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-01-20· cited 35×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-26· cited 16×
- Vazquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-13· cited 3×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.