District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/2/2008
Bedford v. State
Citations
- 970 So. 2d 935
- 2008 WL 36623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that neither a fundamental error nor a manifest injustice occurred where counsel objected to the improper instruction on a permissive lesser-included offense but the issue was not raised on direct appeal
- “Generally it is a denial of due process to convict on a crime not charged.”
- \Generally it is a denial of due process to convict on a crime not charged.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 757×
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-05-15· cited 335×
- Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-30· cited 256×
- Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-05-27· cited 170×
- Koon v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-03-25· cited 104×
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-01-20· cited 35×
- Willie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-20· cited 14×
- Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-04· cited 12×
- Hipp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-25· cited 6×
- Twinn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.