Chevron Corp. v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that whether corporate entity has possession, custody, or control of documents may depend on whether it has ability in ordinary course of business to obtain them from related entity
• describing the test as whether the respondent has the “legal right, authority, or practical ability” to obtain the documents “upon demand”
• “Courts have repeatedly found that employers have control over their employees and can be required to produce documents in their employees’ possession.”
• no work-product protection applied when an attorney both wrote and signed an expert report
• no work-product protection applied when an attorney both wrote and signed an expert report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fort Worth Employees' Retirement Fund v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
  S.D. New York· 2013-12-16· cited 34×
• Maverick Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Does 1 - 1,000
  District of Columbia· 2011-05-12· cited 10×
• Northern Mariana Islands v. Millard
  S.D. New York· 2012-04-12· cited 5×
• Chevron Corp. v. Snaider
  D. Colorado· 2015-01-15
• In re Barnwell Enterprises Ltd.
  D.C. Circuit· 2017-07-13

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Hickman v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
• Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1996-06-13· cited 1,127×
• United States v. Zolin
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 923×
• Premium Mortgage Corp. v. Equifax, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2009-10-14· cited 386×
• United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1998-02-13· cited 379×
• In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1984-03-27· cited 302×
• United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash Babcock
  Second Circuit· 1996-01-02· cited 255×
• In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings United States of America v. John Doe
  Second Circuit· 2000-07-21· cited 250×
• Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1993-06-03· cited 214×
• United States v. Donald E. Jacobs
  Second Circuit· 1997-07-07· cited 166×
• In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dtd. January 4, 1984. United States of America
  Second Circuit· 1984-12-13· cited 122×
• Transamerica Computer Company, Inc., and v. International Business MacHines Corporation, And
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-04-20· cited 116×
• Shcherbakovskiy v. Da Capo Al Fine, Ltd.
  Second Circuit· 2007-06-11· cited 106×
• Marina Mezitis Diorinou v. Nicholas H.E. Mezitis
  Second Circuit· 2001-01-09· cited 88×
• In Re John Doe, Inc. John Doe, Inc. And John Doe v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1994-01-13· cited 83×
• In the Matter of a Grand Jury Subpoena Directed to Marc Rich & Co., A.G. Marc Rich & Co., A.G., a Swiss Corporation v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1983-06-27· cited 81×
• In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 6, 2005
  Second Circuit· 2007-11-16· cited 81×
• Partners v. Blumenthal
  S.D. New York· 2007-01-30· cited 73×
• In Re Sealed Case
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-03-04· cited 71×
• Victrix Steamship Co. v. Salen Dry Cargo A.B.
  Second Circuit· 1987-08-05· cited 70×

Other cases named Chevron Corp. v. Salazar

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Chevron Corp. v. Salazar
  S.D. New York· 2011-08-31· cited 11×
• Chevron Corp. v. Salazar
  S.D. New York· 2011-06-28· cited 3×