Chestnut Hill Development Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying summary judgment on third party beneficiary claim where “[t]he relevant circumstances ... raise factual questions as to whether the parties intended [the third party] to be a third party beneficiary”
• chapter 93A coverage extends to intended third-party beneficiaries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).