Martin v. Ring

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that decision of DIA has issue preclusive effects for defensive purposes
• emphasizing that precluded party “had ample opportunity in the prior adjudication to present evidence and to cross-examine witnesses” and that he could have appealed'from adverse administrative decision
• noting that the doctrine of collateral estoppel “is particularly apt in the workmen’s compensation context”
• finding on issue of causation in workmen’s compensation proceeding could be given defensive collateral es-toppel effect in negligence action brought by worker against home owner
• applying issue preclusion where causation fully litigated in first proceeding and essential to that judgment
• giving preclusive effect to decision of Industrial Accident Board in subsequent tort action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).