Skip to main content
· 6/19/1998

Chemtool, Inc. v. Lubrication Technologies, Inc.

Citations

  • 148 F.3d 742
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13221
  • 1998 WL 325184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that whether the district court applied the correct test for agency under Illinois law is \a question of law to be reviewed de novo\
  • stating that whether the district court applied the correct test for agency under Illinois law is “a question of law to be reviewed de novo”
  • “The test of agency is whether the alleged principal has the right to control the manner and method in which work is carried out by the alleged agent….”
  • “The test of agency is whether the alleged principal has the right to control the manner and method in which work is carried out by the alleged agent....”
  • “All of the factors above weigh in favor of finding that HIG through its alter-ego and agent, Wellpath, is acting under the color of state law . . .”
  • “[T]he existence and scope of an agency relationship are questions of fact, to be decided by the trier of fact.” (quoting Valenti v. Qualex, Inc., 970 F.2d 363, 367 (7th Cir. 1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.