Skip to main content
· 8/16/1983

Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.

Citations

  • 191 Conn. 120
  • 464 A.2d 6
  • 1983 Conn. LEXIS 584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a conditional agreement that did not require compliance' — • unlike the agreements between Otis and the Colombian companies — did not establish sufficient control to create an agency relationship
  • despite no principal and agent relationship court still needed to determine if there was apparent authority
  • trial court correctly determined that there was insufficient evidence to establish agency relationship when there was no evidence that agent was working for benefit of principal
  • The three elements of an agency relationship are \(1) a manifestation by the principal that the agent will act for him; (2) acceptance by the agent of the undertaking; and (3) an understanding CT Page 4733 between the parties that the principal will be in control of the undertaking.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arthur H. Healey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.