Chem Mftr Assn v. EPA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that agency action was arbitrary and capricious where agency offered an explanation that was not supported by the evidence in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sociedad Anonima Viña Santa Rita v. United States Department of the Treasury
  District of Columbia· 2001-08-13· cited 22×
• Rancheria v. Hargan
  D.C. Circuit· 2017-11-07· cited 6×
• Forest Cnty. Potawatomi Cmty. v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-09-10· cited 5×
• Humane Soc'y of the U.S. v. Perdue
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-02-01· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
• Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 8,453×
• United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 1,163×
• Dole v. United Steelworkers
  Supreme Court· 1990-02-21· cited 352×
• Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc. v. Hawke
  D.C. Circuit· 2000-05-16· cited 69×
• Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency
  D.C. Circuit· 2000-07-25· cited 15×
• Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Gorsuch
  D.C. Circuit· 1982-08-17· cited 2×