Rancheria v. Hargan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the jury's review of a victim's video-recorded statements did not implicate defendant's \right to confront evidence or witnesses against him or to assure a fair trial process\
• stating that, absent a fundamental injustice, an appellate court may not reverse based on trial court errors that defense counsel induced or encouraged, or to which counsel consented
• including audiotapes and finding harmless error when pretrial videotaped statements of the defendant and victim did go into jury room with consent of defense counsel
• stating absent a fundamental injustice, an appellate court may not reverse based on the trial court's errors that defense counsel induced or encouraged, or to which counsel consented
• rejecting defendant's challenge to a playback in part because defense counsel said the jury \'probably should review the tape again'\ of the defendant's confession because it would show he was tired
• explaining the Court \expects full and careful consideration and application of the . . . Miller guidance in all situations in which playbacks of video-recorded exhibits or trial proceedings are conducted\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).