Marker v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• legal remedy may be inadequate where relief in the form of damages is not capable of estimation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• W & G Seaford Associates, L.P. v. Eastern Shore Markets, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1989-06-09· cited 19×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
• Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1943-03-15· cited 1,075×
• United States v. Seckinger
  Supreme Court· 1970-03-09· cited 494×
• United States v. County of Allegheny
  Supreme Court· 1944-05-08· cited 448×
• Lach v. Cahill
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1951-12-18· cited 104×
• Equitable Trust Co. v. Gallagher
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1954-02-05· cited 37×
• Chavin v. H. H. Rosin & Co.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1968-10-10· cited 23×
• Burger King Corp. v. Family Dining, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-02-07· cited 15×
• Rosenbaum v. McCaskey
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1980-07-30· cited 9×
• Derwell Company v. Apic, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1971-05-20· cited 7×
• State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Penn Central Corp.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1982-03-31· cited 5×

Other cases named Marker v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Marker v. United States
  D. Idaho· 1930-01-25· cited 1×
• Marker v. United States
  D. Idaho· 1930-06-10
• Marker v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1974-11-18