Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/12/2009
Chastain v. Chastain
Citations
- 672 S.E.2d 108
- 381 S.C. 295
- 2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 9
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an issue is not preserved for appellate review if the issue is not raised to the family court during trial or through post-trial motions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hearn, Short, Konduros
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 485×
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 145×
- Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-02-09· cited 103×
- Davenport v. DavenportSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-12-01· cited 64×
- Stevenson v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-05-23· cited 59×
- Stroman v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-02-23· cited 42×
- Marquez v. CaudillSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-01-22· cited 38×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-12-06· cited 34×
- Paparella v. PaparellaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-04-17· cited 22×
- Washington v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-07-13· cited 21×
- Doe v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-06-19· cited 18×
- Mr. T v. Ms. TCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-15· cited 15×
- Clear v. ClearCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-04-20· cited 8×
- Boykin v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-06-06· cited 7×
- Glanton v. GlantonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-04-25· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.