Washington v. Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding when an appellant neither raises an issue at trial nor through a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion, the issue is not preserved for appellate review.
• holding an issue is not preserved for appellate review when an appellant does not raise an issue at trial or through a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion
• holding the trial court did not err by allowing civil litigant to proceed pro se without determining whether the decision to proceed pro se was knowingly and voluntarily made
• holding when an appellant neither raises an issue at trial nor through a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion to amend, the issue is not properly presented to an appellate court for review
• stating issues not raised to the family court during trial or through post-trial motions are not preserved for appellate review
• \Courts utilize compensatory contempt to restore the plaintiff as nearly as possible to his original position.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Doe v. Doe
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-07-03· cited 120×
• Kearse v. State Health & Human Services Finance Commission
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-04-03· cited 23×
• Parris v. Parris
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-08-07· cited 18×
• State v. Policao
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-03-20· cited 12×
• Abercrombie v. Abercrombie
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-02· cited 11×
• Chastain v. Chastain
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-01-12· cited 11×
• Brooks v. South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-02-15· cited 7×
• Roesler v. Roesler
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-11-09· cited 5×
• Cash v. Cash
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-11-27· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.
  Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
• Hoffman Ex Rel. Estate of Hoffman v. Powell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-06-05· cited 32×
• South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Vanderhorst
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-02-07· cited 28×
• Washington v. Washington
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-07-13· cited 1×