Skip to main content

Chase & Co. v. Little

Citations

  • 156 So. 609
  • 116 Fla. 667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the Florida Supreme Court recognized judicial estoppel with citation to Corpus Juris; however, it found the doctrine was inapplicable to the case at bar because plaintiff did not make inconsistent statements
  • the Florida Supreme Court recognized judicial estoppel with citation to Corpus Juris; however, it found the doctrine was inapplicable to the case at bar because plaintiff did not make inconsistent statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buford, Davis, Terrell, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.