Furst v. Blackman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A sham pleading is one which is ‘undoubtedly false’ and known to be so to the party preparing it.” (quoting Menke v. Southland Specialties Corp., 637 So.2d 285, 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grau v. Provident Life and Acc. Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-30· cited 26×
• Stuart H. Bornstein v. Ira Marcus, individually, Ira Marcus, P.A., a Florida corporation, and Granada, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-22· cited 5×
• Reyes ex rel. Barcenas v. Roush
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-17· cited 5×
• Nalley v. Rotstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-28· cited 1×
• MICHAEL GLEMAN v. MWH AMERICAS, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-01-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-07-12· cited 102×
• Savino v. FLA. DRIVE IN THEATRE MANAGEMENT
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-13· cited 24×
• Chase & Co. v. Little
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1934-09-27· cited 23×
• Gaines v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-23· cited 12×
• Menke v. Southland Specialties Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-22· cited 11×
• Furst v. Blackman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-10· cited 6×