District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/23/2013
Fintak v. Fintak
Citations
- 120 So. 3d 177
- 2013 WL 4483103
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that for judicial estoppel to apply, “the party claiming estoppel must have relied on or been misled by the former position” and “the party seeking estoppel must have changed his or her position to his or her detriment based on the representation”
- “[T]he party against whom estoppel is sought must have asserted a clearly inconsistent or conflicting position in a prior judicial proceeding.” (citing Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 790 So. 2d 1061, 1066 (Fla. 2001))
- \[T]he party against whom estoppel is sought must have asserted a clearly inconsistent or conflicting position in a prior judicial proceeding.\ (citing Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. , 790 So.2d 1061 , 1066 (Fla. 2001) )
- “A party is permitted to plead in the alternative during litigation, and it follows that a party may also take inconsistent actions in his or her own affairs as a mechanism for ‘hedging the bets,’ so long as that action does not result in prejudice to another party.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Silberman, Sleet, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cheryl Searcy v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyEleventh Circuit· 2018-09-05· cited 76×
- Jeffrey Gossett v. Nina M. Gossett, etc., Jennifer Gossett, Glen Gossett, Michelle Gossett, Jake Gossett, Tyler Hering and Krista A. HeringDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-16
- WALTOGUY ANFRIANY and MIRELLE ANFRIANY v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUSTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-06
- Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Marie SuffratDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-11-05
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond BeachSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-18· cited 905×
- Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-07-12· cited 102×
- Palm Beach Co. v. Palm Beach EstatesSupreme Court of Florida· 1933-05-05· cited 28×
- FEDERATED MUT. IMPLEMENT & HDWE. INS. CO. v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-06-11· cited 24×
- Chase & Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Florida· 1934-09-27· cited 23×
- Olin's, Inc. v. Avis Rental Car System of Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1958-07-16· cited 20×
- In Re Estate of SterileDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-03· cited 19×
- Smith v. Avatar Properties, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-10· cited 17×
- Ed Ricke & Sons, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-22· cited 17×
- Steinberg v. Bay Terrace Apt. Hotel, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-11-06· cited 16×
- Barnett Nat. Bank of Jacksonville v. MurreySupreme Court of Florida· 1950-12-19· cited 15×
- PELICAN ISLAND PROP. OWNERS ASS'N, INC. v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-17· cited 14×
- Head v. LaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-10-01· cited 14×
- Pournelle v. BaxterSupreme Court of Florida· 1942-07-07· cited 14×
- Hamblett v. HamblettSuperior Court of New Hampshire· 1833-12-15· cited 13×
- Scocozzo v. General Development CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-11-09· cited 11×
- Carman v. GilbertSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-06-30· cited 11×
- In re Estate of HarbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-11-15· cited 7×
- In Re Pellicer's EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-01-12· cited 6×
- AVVA-BC, LLC v. AmielDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.