Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 8/30/2011

Charvat v. NMP, LLC

Citations

  • 656 F.3d 440
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18081
  • 2011 WL 3805618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff can recover under section 227(b)(3) and section 227(c)(5) even if both violations arose from the same call
  • concluding that a plaintiff was entitled to recover multiple $200.00 awards when multiple OCSPA violations caused separate/distinct harms
  • recognizing that “[s]ubsection [227](c) and its accompanying regulations in 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(d) impose minimum procedures for maintaining a do-not-call list that apply to all calls—live or automated—initiated for telemarketing purposes”
  • holding that the do- not-call provision, § 227(c), was implemented by § 64.1200(d)(4)
  • finding that the regulations regarding internal do-not-call lists were promulgated under subsection (c) and recognizing a private right of action for violating these regulations
  • concluding treble damages are available for willful or knowing violations of automated-call and do- not-call-list provisions of TCPA, “even if both violations occurred in the same call”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batchelder, Guy, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Charvat v. NMP, LLC

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.