· 12/15/1997
Chair King, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Houston Cellular Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Karen Laake, Etc.
Citations
- 131 F.3d 507
- 11 Communications Reg. (P&F) 142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the TCPA's specific authorization of state court jurisdiction should be construed as more than a confirmation of concurrent jurisdiction
- “By creating a private right of action in state courts, Congress allowed states, in effect, to enforce regulation of interstate telemarketing activity.”
- “By creating a private right of action in state courts, Congress allowed states, in effect, to enforce regulation of interstate telemarketing activity.”
- finding exclusive state court jurisdiction under 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(3)
- codified at § 35.47 of the business & commerce code
- finding exclusive state court jurisdiction under 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(3)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, Higginbotham, Dennis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.