Skip to main content

Chapman v. State

Citations

  • 859 S.W.2d 509
  • 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 1946
  • 1993 WL 243960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no error was preserved for appellate review of deprivation of fair trial issue when appellant’s contention that trial court underlined potions of its charge was speculative, disputed by State, and “made for the first time on appeal”
  • “Appellant did not raise the issue of the severity of his sentence either during the punishment phase of trial or in a motion for new trial, and therefore failed to preserve the complaint for appellate review.”
  • “The record contains no indication as to who underscored the lines. We will not accept as fact appellant’s assertions in his appellate brief, which the State disputes as speculative, and which are not supported by the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor, O'Connoe, Hedges, Duggan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.