Chao v. Rothermel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a permanent injunction may be granted “where the moving party has demonstrated that: (1) the exercise of jurisdiction is appropriate; (2) the moving party has actually succeeded on the merits of its claim; and (3
• If the agency is not adding or amending language to the regulation, the rule is interpretive
• “It is not whether Congress uses the term ‘guidelines’ that determines whether the agency must proceed through notice-and-comment rulemaking. Rather . . . it is whether the resulting guidelines constitute procedural or legislative rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).