Chao v. Rothermel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a permanent injunction may be granted “where the moving party has demonstrated that: (1) the exercise of jurisdiction is appropriate; (2) the moving party has actually succeeded on the merits of its claim; and (3
• If the agency is not adding or amending language to the regulation, the rule is interpretive
• “It is not whether Congress uses the term ‘guidelines’ that determines whether the agency must proceed through notice-and-comment rulemaking. Rather . . . it is whether the resulting guidelines constitute procedural or legislative rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Three Rivers Center For Independent Living, Inc. v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Pittsburgh
  Third Circuit· 2004-08-30· cited 98×
• Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration v. Excel Mining, LLC
  D.C. Circuit· 2003-07-08· cited 89×
• Minard Run Oil Co. v. United States Forest Service
  Third Circuit· 2011-09-20· cited 78×
• Levy v. Sterling Holding Co., LLC
  Third Circuit· 2008-10-01· cited 66×
• United States v. Thurston Paul Bell
  Third Circuit· 2005-07-12· cited 55×
• Sbc Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America
  Third Circuit· 2005-07-14· cited 28×
• Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. Stolt-Nielsen Transportation Group Ltd. Richard B. Wingfield v. United States
  Third Circuit· 2006-03-23· cited 24×
• Commonwealth of Pennsylvania D v. United States
  Third Circuit· 2018-07-25· cited 14×
• Louisiana Forestry Ass'n v. Solis
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-08-20· cited 10×
• Tomasi v. Twp. of Long Beach
  D. New Jersey· 2019-01-31· cited 5×
• Barran v. Johnson
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-06-28· cited 4×
• HODINKA v. Delaware County
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-01-07· cited 3×
• National Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescue
  D. New Jersey· 2010-09-21· cited 2×
• World Wide Street Preachers' Fellowship v. Reed
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-05-08· cited 1×
• Three Rivers Center for Independent Living, Inc. v. Housing Authority
  Third Circuit· 2004-08-30· cited 1×
• International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Chao
  Third Circuit· 2004-03-22· cited 1×
• Pennsylvania, Department of Human Services v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-03-13· cited 1×
• International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Of America, Uaw v. Elaine Chao
  Third Circuit· 2004-03-22
• SBC Comm Inc v. FCC
  Third Circuit· 2005-07-14
• United States v. Bell
  Third Circuit· 2005-07-12

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Better Government Association v. Department of State National Wildlife Federation v. United States Department of Interior
  D.C. Circuit· 1986-01-03· cited 193×
• Ciba-Geigy Corporation v. Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1985-01-08· cited 141×
• Vinodbhai Bholidas Patel v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States
  Third Circuit· 2002-06-20· cited 49×
• Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. United States Department of Labor
  D.C. Circuit· 1999-04-09· cited 39×
• Beazer East, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region III
  Third Circuit· 1992-05-12· cited 30×
• Ameristeel Corp. v. Inter. Broth. of Teamsters
  Third Circuit· 2001-09-26· cited 27×
• Consolidation Coal Company v. Federal Mine Safety And Health Review Commission
  Third Circuit· 1984-08-13· cited 3×
• Secretary Labor v. Rothermel
  Third Circuit· 2003-05-08· cited 1×