· 9/20/2011
Minard Run Oil Co. v. United States Forest Service
Citations
- 670 F.3d 236
- 177 Oil & Gas Rep. 1
- 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20294
- 73 ERC (BNA) 1932
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19265
- 2011 WL 4389220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the completion of an environmental impact statement “would constitute final agency action”
- noting the economic injury exception only applies where “the potential economic loss is so great as to threaten the existence of the movant’s business”
- “Granting the injunction would vindicate the public’s interest in aiding the local economy [and] protecting the property rights of mineral rights owners . . . .” (citation omitted)
- exercising de novo review over question whether an administrative agency’s action was “final”
- “[W]here interests involving real property are at stake, preliminary injunctive relief can be particularly appropriate.”
- “About 48% of the mineral rights in the ANF are reserved rights and the vast majority of these are 1911 rights ... ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fuentes, Chagares, Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.