Skip to main content
· 9/20/2011

Minard Run Oil Co. v. United States Forest Service

Citations

  • 670 F.3d 236
  • 177 Oil & Gas Rep. 1
  • 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20294
  • 73 ERC (BNA) 1932
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19265
  • 2011 WL 4389220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the completion of an environmental impact statement “would constitute final agency action”
  • noting the economic injury exception only applies where “the potential economic loss is so great as to threaten the existence of the movant’s business”
  • “Granting the injunction would vindicate the public’s interest in aiding the local economy [and] protecting the property rights of mineral rights owners . . . .” (citation omitted)
  • exercising de novo review over question whether an administrative agency’s action was “final”
  • “[W]here interests involving real property are at stake, preliminary injunctive relief can be particularly appropriate.”
  • “About 48% of the mineral rights in the ANF are reserved rights and the vast majority of these are 1911 rights ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Chagares, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.