Barran v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jurors’ experiment that was “consistent with the legal proofs ... at trial” was proper
• motion for new trial denied where the jury disengaged an overhead aisle directory admitted in evidence because the experiment was “simply a reproduction of an experiment conducted in open court at the insistence of the allegedly aggrieved party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).