Chambers v. Hunt Petroleum Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The trial court was justified in inferring that the Chamberses’ refusal to respond to Hunt’s repeated attempts to communicate with them during the critical sixty day period for closing was calculated to defeat Hunt’s exercise of its option.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).