Besteman v. Pitcock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an unconscionability finding is appropriate only “where the inequity of the term is so extreme as to shock the conscience”
• “If a contract is worded so that a court may properly give it a definite or certain legal meaning or interpretation, then it is not ambiguous.”
• “Any failure to exercise an option [to purchase] according to its terms, including an untimely or defective acceptance, is simply ineffectual, and legally amounts to nothing more than a rejection.”
• requiring strict compliance with provisions of option contract
• requiring strict compliance with provisions of option contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).