Ben Jarvis v. Robert J. Peltier, Sr. and Calvin C. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “option to purchase” provision in a contract did not provide an option agreement because it did not give the buyer a right to compel sale of the property and did not state a fixed purchase price
• “The right-holder does not have a duty to act in order to exercise his preferential purchase right unless and until he receives a reasonable disclosure of the terms of the sale.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).