Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/21/1979
Central Storage & Transfer Co. v. Kaplan
Citations
- 410 A.2d 292
- 487 Pa. 485
- 1979 Pa. LEXIS 808
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- doctrine of promissory estoppel embodied in section 90 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts is the law of Pennsylvania
- doctrine of promissory estoppel embodied in section 90 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts is the law of Pennsylvania
- “The doctrine embodied in s[ection] 90 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, the doctrine of promissory estoppel, is the law of Pennsylvania.”
- Individuals “ ‘contracting with a governmental agency must, at their peril, know the extent of the power of its officers making the contract.’ ”
- the Commonwealth or its subdivisions and instrumentalities cannot be estopped by the acts of its agents if those acts are outside the agent’s powers, in violation of positive law, or acts which require legislative or executive action
- the doctrine of estoppel may be applied against a municipality based upon a municipal official’s act, but not if those acts are “outside the agent’s power” or “in violation of positive law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Manderino, Larsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pyeritz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-23· cited 160×
- Thatcher's Drug Store of West Goshen, Inc. v. Consolidated Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-01-13· cited 83×
- C & K Petroleum Products, Inc. v. EquibankThird Circuit· 1988-02-18· cited 63×
- Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. American Ash Recycling Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-03-17· cited 63×
- Dave Greytak Enterprises, Inc. v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1992-01-28· cited 47×
- Chester Extended Care Center v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-07· cited 44×
- Storms Ex Rel. Storms v. O'MALLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-06-20· cited 28×
- Wayne Moving & Storage of New Jersey, Inc. v. School DistrictThird Circuit· 2010-10-28· cited 22×
- Health Scan, Ltd. v. Travelers InsuranceE.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-11-28· cited 20×
- Carroll v. City of Philadelphia, Board of Pensions & Retirement Municipal Pension FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-09· cited 19×
- Foster v. Westmoreland Casualty Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-21· cited 18×
- Hill v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-02-28· cited 18×
- Cosgrove v. State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-02· cited 18×
- Guerra v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PHILA.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-08-24· cited 17×
- Pyeritz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-15· cited 15×
- Halstead v. Motorcycle Safety Foundation, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1999-10-08· cited 15×
- Punxsutawney Municipal Airport Authority v. LellockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-21· cited 14×
- Borkey v. Township of CentreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-27· cited 13×
- Siegel Transfer, Inc. v. Carrier Express, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-07-01· cited 11×
- MURPHY v. BradleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-11· cited 11×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Northwestern National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1942-06-29· cited 83×
- Murphy & Slota v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-26· cited 48×
- Lowry v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-11-13· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. Seagram Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-11-08· cited 22×
- Whitford Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-01-12· cited 12×
Other cases named Central Storage & Transfer Co. v. Kaplan
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.