Skip to main content

Central Storage & Transfer Co. v. Kaplan

Citations

  • 410 A.2d 292
  • 487 Pa. 485
  • 1979 Pa. LEXIS 808

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • doctrine of promissory estoppel embodied in section 90 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts is the law of Pennsylvania
  • doctrine of promissory estoppel embodied in section 90 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts is the law of Pennsylvania
  • “The doctrine embodied in s[ection] 90 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, the doctrine of promissory estoppel, is the law of Pennsylvania.”
  • Individuals “ ‘contracting with a governmental agency must, at their peril, know the extent of the power of its officers making the contract.’ ”
  • the Commonwealth or its subdivisions and instrumentalities cannot be estopped by the acts of its agents if those acts are outside the agent’s powers, in violation of positive law, or acts which require legislative or executive action
  • the doctrine of estoppel may be applied against a municipality based upon a municipal official’s act, but not if those acts are “outside the agent’s power” or “in violation of positive law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Manderino, Larsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Central Storage & Transfer Co. v. Kaplan

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.