MURPHY v. Bradley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Baldwin to determine judicial order was not law within Article III, § 27's meaning
• relying on Baldwin to determine judicial order was not law within Article III, § 27's meaning
• applying Baldwin to uphold a court action suspending a wage increase
• where plaintiff received raise in six prior years and relied on future raise when applying for a mortgage, and raise was not paid, plaintiff had no claim for detrimental reliance because he had relied solely on his own “mistaken judgment” that future raises were forthcoming

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).