Supreme Court of Delaware· 10/21/1996
Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.
Citations
- 684 A.2d 289
- 1996 WL 613201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing that the company’s value should take into account the new strategy implemented by a majority shareholder before the minority was cashed-out
- holding that because management implemented the “Perelman Plan” after a first-step tender offer and before a second-step merger, the trial court was obligated to value the company’s operative reality at the time of the merger based on the Perelman Plan
- emphasizing that the appraisal statute requires the court to appraise fair value “as of the date of the merger”
- observing, in context of appraisal of publicly traded company following arm’s-length deal, that the “market price of shares may not be representative of fair value” (internal quotation marks omitted
- observing, in context of appraisal of publicly traded company following arm’s-length deal, that the “market price of shares may not be representative of fair value” (internal quotation marks omitted
- observing, in context of appraisal of publicly traded company following arm’s-length deal, that the “market price of shares may not be representative of fair value” (internal quotation marks omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walsh, Holland, Horsey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Montgomery Cellular Holding Co. v. DoblerSupreme Court of Delaware· 2005-08-01· cited 127×
- Golden Telecom, Inc. v. GLOBAL GT LPSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-12-29· cited 85×
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-06-28· cited 83×
- ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.S.D. Texas· 2008-08-30· cited 81×
- Union Illinois 1995 Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Union Financial Group, Ltd.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2004-01-05· cited 79×
- M.P.M. Enterprises, Inc. v. GilbertSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-06-25· cited 75×
- Delaware Open MRI Radiology Associates, P.A. v. KesslerCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2006-04-26· cited 60×
- DFC Global Corporation v. Muirfield Value Partners, L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2017-08-01· cited 54×
- Onti, Inc. v. Integra BankCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1999-07-01· cited 50×
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2000-07-07· cited 49×
- Hansen v. 75 Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1998-04-09· cited 46×
- Gonsalves v. Straight Arrow Publishers, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1997-10-21· cited 40×
- Paskill Corp. v. Alcoma Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2000-03-07· cited 29×
- Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhardCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-09-16· cited 29×
- Casey v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-08-01· cited 26×
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonN.D. Oklahoma· 2017-04-25· cited 26×
- Gotham Partners, L.P. v. Hallwood Realty Partners, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2003-07-08· cited 23×
- Turner v. BernsteinCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2000-06-06· cited 22×
- Hogle v. Zinetics Medical, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 2002-12-13· cited 19×
- Borruso v. Communications Telesystems InternationalCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1999-09-24· cited 18×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-02-01· cited 690×
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-01-18· cited 456×
- Rosenblatt v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-05-09· cited 268×
- Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1995-07-17· cited 242×
- Cavalier Oil Corp. v. HarnettSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-09-05· cited 154×
- Tri-Continental Corporation v. BattyeSupreme Court of Delaware· 1950-06-08· cited 132×
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1988-06-10· cited 127×
- Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1990-03-09· cited 105×
- Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1994-10-12· cited 93×
- Goodrich v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1996-08-26· cited 89×
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-02-24· cited 72×
- In Re the Appraisal of Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1992-05-26· cited 67×
- Summa Corp. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1988-04-04· cited 65×
- Rapid-American Corp. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-01-23· cited 62×
- Alabama By-Products Corp. v. NealSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-03-08· cited 60×
- Rothschild International Corp. v. Liggett Group Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-20· cited 52×
- Bell v. Kirby Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1980-02-20· cited 51×
- Kahn v. Household Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1991-04-11· cited 50×
- In Re Radiology Associates, Inc. LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1991-11-01· cited 45×
- Application of Delaware Racing Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1965-08-02· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.