Union Illinois 1995 Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Union Financial Group, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the merger price offered the best indication of fair value and also performing a confirmatory DCF analysis
• observing that In re Appraisal of Jarden Corporation Consolidated C.A. No. 12456-VCS September 7, 2018 Page 4 inquiry under our rules of evidence asks whether: (a
• interpreting Section 262(h) to “exclude[] synergies in accordance with the mandate of Delaware jurisprudence that the subject company in an appraisal proceeding be valued as a going concern.”
• interpreting Section 262(h) to “exclude[] synergies in accordance with the mandate of Delaware jurisprudence that the subject company in an appraisal proceeding be valued as a going concern”
• adopting the Fama-French approach to cost of capital over the more widely accepted CAPM approach because the court determined the former approach to be more reliable and more appropriate for use in that valuation of a regional bank
• awarding “the value of the Merger Price net of synergies” after finding that the deal price was “the most reliable evidence of fair value” and “giving 100% weight to that factor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).