Cathy Ann Glater v. Eli Lilly & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in state advertising, eight sales representatives covering state, and sales to wholesale distributors in-state were 11 insufficient to support general jurisdiction
• concluding that advertising in trade journals circulated in state, employment of eight sales representatives in state, and sale of products to distributors in state were not sufficient to support general jurisdiction
• concluding that advertising in trade journals circulated in state, employment of eight sales representatives in state, and sale of products to distributors in state were not sufficient to support general jurisdiction
• finding that standard for specific jurisdiction was inapplicable to the circumstances presented in the case and focusing analysis on general jurisdiction
• finding that even employing salespersons to solicit orders in a forum is not sufficient to grant in personam jurisdiction
• advertising in the forum, employing sales representatives to distribute information in the forum, and selling products to distributors in the forum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).