Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court may determine the second action to be duplicative if the parties “represent the same interests”
• concluding, in evaluating personal jurisdiction, that “public relations materials suggest [ing] that Klynveld is a global firm or an international network of member firms” do not justify a finding of a partnership or agency between Klynveld and Peat Marwick US
• dismissing a second duplicative suit in favor of a prior pending action where plaintiffs’ claims in the two actions were “virtually identical” and arose out of the same employment relationship
• requests for “affirmative relief’ by defendant not waiver of service objection, where service objection presented “prior to or simultaneously with the request for affirmative relief’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).