Copeland v. Alsobrook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we make objective determination regarding meeting of minds by reviewing “the communications between the parties and . . . the acts and circumstances surrounding those communications.”
• applying an objective standard in determining whether the parties had a meeting of the minds
• affirming finding of oral contract, in part, because “the contract was later confirmed in writing”
• letter referencing oral contract was some evidence that contract existed
• letter referencing oral contract was some evidence that contract existed
• agreement that lacks consideration is unenforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).