Castro v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was within trial court's discretion to reject appellant's contention that he did not speak English in light of officer's testimony that appellant conversed with officer in English at scene of arrest prior to the arrest
• no objection when K-9 began search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rabb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-15· cited 40×
• State v. Kindle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-12· cited 37×
• State of Arizona v. Rosa Elene Becerra
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-01-25· cited 13×
• Dormezil v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-31· cited 10×
• State v. Rabb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23· cited 8×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Place
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
• Florida v. Jimeno
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
• United States v. Alfonso Sierra-Hernandez
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-09-05· cited 174×
• United States v. Richard Samuel Huffhines
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-06-15· cited 146×
• Sierra-Hernandez v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-10-30· cited 132×
• United States v. Eduardo Javier Perez
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-10-04· cited 99×
• United States v. Edilberto Gonzalez-Basulto
  Fifth Circuit· 1990-04-09· cited 50×
• United States v. Jose Jesus Uribe-Galindo
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-03-30· cited 35×
• Customer Co. v. City of Sacramento
  Supreme Court· 1996-02-20· cited 12×
• State v. McLeod
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-13· cited 9×
• Gilbert v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-21· cited 8×
• State v. Cardosa
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-04· cited 4×