State v. McLeod

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding consent did not encompass the use of a dog and that nothing in the surrounding circumstances suggested that it did
• finding consent did not encompass the use of a dog and that nothing in the surrounding circumstances suggested that it did

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rabb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-15· cited 40×
• State of Arizona v. Rosa Elene Becerra
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-01-25· cited 13×
• State v. Rabb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23· cited 8×
• Castro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-26· cited 6×
• State v. Drysdale
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-08· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Valdivia, R., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-10-17

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Place
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
• State v. Wells
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-03-02· cited 112×
• Dominguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-16· cited 6×