Albathani v. INS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the BIA’s “affirmance without opinion” procedure does not violate due process
• holding that, so long as a rational basis was set forth in some stage of agency proceedings, the BIA may affirm IJ decisions without an opinion
• stating that an unadmitted alien present in the United States has only \limited\ due process rights
• stating that an unadmitted alien present in the United States has only “limited” due process rights
• holding that the BIA’s “affirmance without opinion” procedure does not violate due process
• noting that Chenery only requires the relevant agency, here the INS, to give reasons for its decisions, which may issue from either the BIA or an IJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).