Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 3/5/2014

Castagna v. Luceno

Citations

  • 744 F.3d 254
  • 2014 WL 840964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “filing an EEOC charge does not toll the time for filing state tort claims, including those that arise out of the same nucleus of facts alleged in the charge of discrimination filed with the EEOC”
  • “filing an EEOC charge does not toll the time for filing state tort claims, including those 19 that arise out of the same nucleus of facts alleged in the charge of discrimination filed with the 20 EEOC.”
  • “Because Congress did not intend for the filing of a charge of discrimination with the EEOC to toll the statute of limitations applicable to state tort claims, we . . . conclude[e] that lodging a charge of discrimination with the EEOC does not toll those state claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Lohier, Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Castagna v. Luceno

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.