· 2/18/1992
Anna M. Juarez v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Incorporated
Citations
- 957 F.2d 317
- 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 343
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2077
- 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,286
- 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 152
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that under Johnson, state-law tort claims were separate and independent from Title VII claims
- holding plaintiff’s earlier-filed Title VII claim did not toll the statute of limitations on an invasion of privacy claim
- holding the statute of limitations for a state-law invasion of privacy claim is not tolled by the filing of a discrimination charge with the EEOC
- finding no duty to report where company’s policy did not require it of supervisor with knowledge of alleged sexual harassment
- considering the timing of plaintiff’s com- plaints together with other circumstantial evidence of retali- atory motive
- no factual issue as to pretext where employer fully informed employee of deficiencies, in performance, enabling her to take corrective action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Manion, Eschbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.