Skip to main content
· 2/18/1992

Anna M. Juarez v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Incorporated

Citations

  • 957 F.2d 317
  • 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 343
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2077
  • 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,286
  • 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under Johnson, state-law tort claims were separate and independent from Title VII claims
  • holding plaintiff’s earlier-filed Title VII claim did not toll the statute of limitations on an invasion of privacy claim
  • holding the statute of limitations for a state-law invasion of privacy claim is not tolled by the filing of a discrimination charge with the EEOC
  • finding no duty to report where company’s policy did not require it of supervisor with knowledge of alleged sexual harassment
  • considering the timing of plaintiff’s com- plaints together with other circumstantial evidence of retali- atory motive
  • no factual issue as to pretext where employer fully informed employee of deficiencies, in performance, enabling her to take corrective action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Manion, Eschbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.