Katel Ltd. Liability Co. v. AT & T CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that evidence of custom or practice “should not be admitted to create an ambiguity in an otherwise clear and unambiguous agreement
• “declining] to endorse” “interpretation of the Agreement [that] leads to an illogical result”
• “A plaintiff must also establish ‘the defendant’s intentional and unjustified procurement of the third party’s breach of the contract.’”
• “An argument raised for the first time on appeal is typically forfeited.”
• “An argument raised for the first time on appeal is typically forfeited.”
• “An argument raised for the first time on appeal is typically forfeited.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).