Supreme Court of Florida· 11/20/1951
Cassara v. Wofford
Citations
- 55 So. 2d 102
- 1951 Fla. LEXIS 903
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘it is universally held that in arbitration proceedings . . . persons whose rights and obligations are affected thereby have an absolute right to be heard and to present their evidence, after reasonable notice of the time and place of the hearing’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schnurmacher Holding, Inc. v. NoriegaSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-05-04· cited 98×
- Middlesex Mutual Insurance Company v. Stuart LevineEleventh Circuit· 1982-05-10· cited 74×
- Nizinski v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'n, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1973-04-27· cited 67×
- National Tea Co. v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-09-12· cited 55×
- Citizens Property Insurance v. Mango Hill 6 Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-10· cited 26×
- Communications Workers v. School Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-24· cited 19×
- Robinson v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-03-27· cited 17×
- Visiting Nurse Association of Florida, Inc. v. Jupiter Medical CenterSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-11-06· cited 17×
- Tassinari v. LoyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-08-31· cited 16×
- Florida Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. SheafferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-31· cited 16×
- Von Enginerring Co. v. Rw Roberts Const.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-13· cited 14×
- Kidwell v. General Motors Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-03· cited 14×
- Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-07-01· cited 13×
- Gaines Construction Co. v. Carol City Utilities, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-05-26· cited 13×
- Wells v. Halmac Development, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-13· cited 12×
- National Hotel v. KoretzkySupreme Court of Florida· 1957-07-10· cited 9×
- Lee v. MarcusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-10· cited 9×
- INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SchragerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-19· cited 8×
- Preferred Ins. Co. v. Richard Parks Trucking Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-12-11· cited 8×
- Dairyland Insurance Company v. HudnallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-06-26· cited 7×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court· 1910-05-31· cited 168×
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-12-06· cited 130×
- Citizens Bldg. of West Palm Beach, Inc. v. Western Union Tel. Co.Fifth Circuit· 1941-06-23· cited 23×
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Textile Corp. & Sheila-Lynn, Inc.New York Supreme Court· 1939-12-20· cited 17×
- Sydnor Pump & Well Co. v. County School BoardSupreme Court of Virginia· 1943-12-06· cited 16×
- Ogden v. BaileSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-05-24· cited 12×
- Seldner Corporation v. WR Grace & Co.D. Maryland· 1938-02-23· cited 11×
- Shipman v. FletcherSupreme Court of Virginia· 1886-12-02· cited 8×
- In re the Arbitration between Rosenberg & WolfeNew York Supreme Court· 1943-03-04· cited 7×
- In re HermanNew York Supreme Court· 1938-12-19· cited 4×
- Brown's Executors v. FarnandisWashington Supreme Court· 1902-01-08· cited 3×
- Inslee v. FlaggSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1857-11-15· cited 2×
- In re the Arbitration between Frajer & ChernofskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1951-05-08· cited 1×
Other cases named Cassara v. Wofford
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.